The Long Investor
patreon
The LIT Sunday News
🕑 Added 2025-04-06 19:58:48 +0000 UTCU.S. Stocks Lose $5.4 Trillion in Two-Day Rout as Trump Tariffs Spark Recession Fears
Key Developments
The S&P 500 plunged 6% on Friday, following a 4.8% drop Thursday — the worst weekly decline (-9.1%) since the pandemic began
China responded with 34% tariffs on all U.S. imports, escalating the trade standoff
Nasdaq entered bear market territory, down over 20% from its December peak
Europe’s Stoxx 600 fell 8.4%, UK’s FTSE 100 -7%, and Asia’s MSCI index -4.5%
Economic and Market Impact
Leading economists and banks slashed U.S. growth forecasts for 2025:
JPMorgan now sees –0.3% GDP contraction (vs. +1.3% prior)
Citigroup cut its forecast to +0.1% (from +0.6%)
Unemployment expected to rise to 5.3%, per JPMorgan
Fed Chair Jay Powell warned that the tariffs would lead to “higher inflation and slower growth,” adding that their scale and economic impact are larger than expected.
Despite a strong March jobs report (unemployment at 4.2%), the mood in financial markets turned deeply risk-off:
Corporate bond spreads widened, IPOs (like Klarna) paused
VIX surged 15.1 pts to 45.1, highest since 2020
Oil prices collapsed:
Brent: –6.5% to $65.58, lowest in 3 years
WTI: –7.4% to $61.99, below shale breakeven
Copper fell 9%, signaling industrial pessimism
10-year Treasury yield dropped to 3.86%, a post-election low
Geopolitical Context
Trump’s tariff policy — branded “liberation day” — aims to rebalance trade, but markets see it as a trigger for global economic fragmentation. China’s aggressive response and other retaliatory threats have amplified downside risks.
Trump called for Fed rate cuts, but Powell’s speech emphasized the negative inflationary effects of the tariffs, limiting the Fed’s flexibility.
TL;DR
Trump’s aggressive tariff escalation has triggered a $5.4tn stock market rout, renewed trade war fears, and steep downward revisions to U.S. economic growth forecasts. As China retaliates and volatility surges, analysts warn of an impending U.S. and EU recession unless tensions de-escalate rapidly. Markets are in full risk-off mode, with tech stocks plunging, commodities tanking, and Treasury yields falling.
Trump Hints at China Tariff Relief in Exchange for TikTok Divestment Deal
Key Developments
Trump: “The tariffs give us great power to negotiate.”
Comes just a day after imposing 34% tariffs on Chinese imports, following a previous 20% levy
A TikTok sale deal is reportedly “very close”, with multiple U.S. investors involved
Trump extended the divestment deadline to Saturday, per congressional legislation passed last year
The move introduces a quid pro quo-style negotiation, adding complexity to both the U.S.–China trade war and the TikTok national security issue.
Structure of the Proposed Deal
The current proposal would see TikTok spun out into a new U.S.-based entity with a revised ownership structure to comply with U.S. law:
New investors (e.g., Andreessen Horowitz, Blackstone, Silver Lake) would own ~50%
Existing investors (KKR, General Atlantic, Coatue) would hold 30%
ByteDance would retain <20%, below the “foreign adversary” limit
Oracle would manage U.S. data security
One sticking point remains: who controls TikTok’s algorithm. Options include:
ByteDance retaining algorithm control, with the U.S. group licensing access (China’s preference)
Full U.S. control, which hawks like Marco Rubio and Mike Waltz insist is essential for compliance
Geopolitical and Policy Context
The proposal is designed to navigate Chinese regulatory red lines while satisfying U.S. security concerns around algorithmic influence and data access.
The White House is actively mediating between ByteDance, Beijing, and U.S. investors
TikTok’s algorithm has become a flashpoint, with critics warning any continued Chinese control undermines national security
The outcome may set a precedent for future deals involving Chinese tech firms in sensitive sectors
The Chinese government has not commented, and ByteDance has yet to respond publicly.
TL;DR
Trump has floated a tariff-for-TikTok deal, potentially easing import levies if Beijing allows ByteDance to divest TikTok under U.S.-approved terms. A new ownership structure is nearing finalization, but algorithm control remains the critical hurdle. The deal would represent a major intersection of trade, tech, and national security, with implications far beyond TikTok.
Trump–Powell Feud Erupts Amid Market Turmoil, Tariffs, and Recession Fears
Key Developments
Trump imposed sweeping “liberation day” tariffs, prompting a $5.4 trillion drop in U.S. stock market value over two days
Powell publicly rebuked the tariffs, warning they would cause "higher inflation and slower growth," with effects "much higher than expected"
Trump retaliated by demanding an emergency Fed rate cut, accusing Powell of “playing politics” by delaying action until May
With the Dow down 3,000 points, Trump may be framing Powell as a scapegoat for the market meltdown, potentially setting up a narrative shift if the crisis deepens.
Political and Market Tensions
The feud has broken long-standing norms of Fed independence and has stirred concern over institutional stability:
Trump has already defied precedent by firing FTC commissioners mid-term, raising fears he could attempt to remove Powell to install a loyalist
Powell defended the Fed’s autonomy and pushed back on claims of economic malaise:
“The economy coming into this year was in robust good health… Unemployment is low. Growth is solid.”
Powell also implied recent strong job data do not yet reflect the damage from tariff uncertainty, pointing to rising recession risk now being acknowledged by external forecasters.
Market Reaction and Policy Risks
While Trump’s tariffs were meant to protect U.S. industry, markets are instead pricing in economic instability:
The 10-year Treasury yield fell to ~4% on safe-haven buying, not central bank intervention
The U.S. dollar weakened, then stabilized, showing mixed investor sentiment
Long-term interest rates — more important for the economy — could surge if the Fed is seen as politically compromised
Economists warn that if Powell succumbs to political pressure, inflation expectations and bond yields may rise, worsening the economic outlook.
Broader Implications
The public clash between the White House and the Fed has stoked fears that American exceptionalism is faltering, with political interference eroding confidence in once-independent institutions.
“If America starts to act like a banana republic without bananas,” Arends writes, “should the U.S. stock market trade at a premium — or a discount?”
TL;DR
A full-blown power struggle between Trump and Fed Chair Powell has erupted just as markets plunge and recession fears grow. Trump is pushing for an emergency rate cut while laying the groundwork to blame Powell if the crisis worsens. Powell, meanwhile, is holding the line on Fed independence, warning that Trump’s tariff blitz is inflating risk and threatening growth. Markets now face not only economic turmoil — but institutional instability at the heart of U.S. monetary policy.
China’s AI Race Intensifies as DeepSeek and Alibaba Surge Ahead
Key Developments
DeepSeek released its V3 model, showing significant improvements in reasoning and coding, and made it openly available via Hugging Face
Alibaba’s new Qwen model is light enough to run on mobile devices, and supports multimodal input (text, image, audio, video)
Alibaba aims to power AI agents for accessibility, such as real-time audio guides for the visually impaired
These breakthroughs bring Chinese models closer to U.S. leaders like OpenAI, while also expanding real-world use cases and global developer access.
Market and Industry Impact
The rapid pace of advancement is triggering a divergence within China’s tech sector, as not all firms keep up.
Baidu’s AI offerings lag in both performance and adoption, leading to stock underperformance
In contrast, Alibaba’s share price has nearly doubled, while Tencent is also enjoying strong investor sentiment due to clear AI momentum
The divide reflects growing bets on which companies will dominate China’s next-gen cloud, enterprise, and public sector AI ecosystems
“The model that wins the most users today will probably dominate tomorrow’s platforms, infrastructure, and government contracts.”
Strategic Context
AI leadership is now seen as a core pillar of long-term business growth in China. Winning models can secure access to:
Public sector contracts (healthcare, education, national security)
Enterprise software integration
Smart city and cloud infrastructure opportunities
In China’s governance framework, AI dominance can mean recurring, state-backed revenues, making current model races not just a tech contest, but a high-stakes strategic imperative.
TL;DR
China’s AI boom is evolving into a winner-takes-most race, with DeepSeek and Alibaba pulling ahead on performance and deployment. As models increasingly power mobile, enterprise, and public sector applications, the market is shifting its bets toward firms positioned to lead the next phase of cloud and smart infrastructure AI — leaving laggards like Baidu at risk of being sidelined.
China Expresses Optimism on Deeper Financial Ties with UK Amid Green Bond Launch
Key Developments
The launch took place at the London Stock Exchange, with UK City Minister Emma Reynolds in attendance
Marks a symbolic step in China’s engagement with international green finance
Liao emphasized this as a “win-win” opportunity and noted both countries are aligned on stronger economic and financial collaboration
The issuance follows several high-level diplomatic visits, signaling thawing UK–China relations under Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government.
Diplomatic Context
The event comes amid a renewed diplomatic push between the UK and China:
UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Foreign Secretary David Lammy have visited Beijing in recent months
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi visited London in February
PM Keir Starmer is expected to visit China later this year
Liao acknowledged bilateral relations have had “ups and downs”, but pointed to growing convergence on financial services, investment, and climate goals.
Green Bond Strategy and Global Ambitions
China plans to broaden its green bond issuance globally, with potential expansion in scope, currency types, and issuance locations.
China’s green bond launch in London is seen as a signal of commitment to low-carbon development
Chinese Ambassador Zheng Zeguang called the issuance a “testament” to China's climate finance ambitions
Both President Xi and PM Starmer reportedly view economic links as a central pillar of the evolving relationship
The move also reflects London’s continued relevance as a global financial hub, particularly in sustainable finance, despite broader geopolitical friction.
TL;DR
China’s vice-finance minister expressed optimism over stronger UK–China financial ties during the launch of renminbi green bonds in London, part of China’s growing global climate finance strategy. Amid a renewed wave of diplomatic engagement under PM Starmer, both nations are positioning economic and climate cooperation as foundational to future bilateral relations.
Amazon Set to Launch First Kuiper Satellites, Challenging Starlink's Dominance
Key Developments
27 operational Kuiper satellites will be launched via ULA Atlas V rocket from Cape Canaveral
This is the first step in Amazon’s plan to deploy 3,236 satellites into low Earth orbit (~600 km altitude)
Project Kuiper targets retail, business, and government customers—the same segments as Starlink
This launch follows Amazon’s two prototype satellite tests in October 2023 and is a critical milestone as the company races against an FCC-imposed deadline.
Market and Industry Impact
Amazon’s entry could break the strategic dominance of Starlink, which currently:
Controls over 60% of satellites in orbit
Has launched 7,000+ satellites since 2019
Serves 4.5 million customers in 100+ countries
Plays a key role in Ukraine’s military connectivity
Governments have grown uneasy with Starlink’s influence, particularly after threats of service withdrawal during the U.S.-Ukraine talks.
Amazon’s move provides a long-awaited alternative, though real competition will depend on execution and speed of deployment.
Operational Challenges and Timeline
Despite bold ambitions, experts warn that Amazon faces major logistical hurdles:
Manufacturing pace is currently far too slow:
“They need to go from building two satellites a month to two a day.” – Armand Musey, Summit Ridge GroupAmazon must launch 50% of its constellation by mid-2026 to meet FCC rules, or request an extension
The company booked 83 rocket launches from ULA, Arianespace, Blue Origin, and even SpaceX in 2022—the largest launch contract in history
Amazon says it aims to offer operational service this year, but coverage will expand gradually.
Strategic Context
The Kuiper–Starlink rivalry reflects a broader geopolitical and commercial race to control low Earth orbit connectivity:
Satellite internet is increasingly seen as critical infrastructure for national security, disaster response, and digital inclusion
Starlink’s military utility has made it a strategic asset—and a political liability
Amazon’s involvement may diversify global dependency and reduce the concentration of power in space communications
TL;DR
Amazon is finally entering the satellite broadband race, launching its first 27 Kuiper satellites to challenge Musk’s Starlink monopoly. While the move is welcomed by regulators and governments wary of SpaceX’s dominance, Amazon must overcome massive manufacturing and deployment hurdles to catch up. With FCC deadlines looming, Kuiper’s performance in 2025 could define the next era of satellite-powered internet access.
Tesla Suffers Worst Quarter Since 2022 as Deliveries Tumble
Key Developments
Tesla delivered just 336,681 vehicles in Q1 2025 — well below both analyst expectations (390,000) and last year’s Q1 total (387,000). This marks the company’s weakest quarter since 2022 and places it behind China’s BYD, which delivered 416,388 EVs in the same period.
Tesla’s global market share dropped, especially in China and Europe
Political backlash, particularly Elon Musk’s ties to Trump and leadership of the Department of Government Efficiency ("Doge"), contributed to brand damage
Shares dropped 6.3% early in the day but rebounded +5% on news that Musk may leave Trump’s administration
Market and Industry Impact
Tesla’s underperformance coincides with:
Fierce competition in China from BYD and legacy automakers like BMW and VW
European backlash over Musk’s political activity, causing sharp drops in new registrations
Delays in the Model Y redesign, with upgrades rolling out in phases
Quality issues: Tesla recently recalled all 46,000 Cybertrucks in the U.S. over defective exterior panels
Tesla’s U.S. market share slipped, with deliveries falling 11% YoY in Q1, per Autodata — despite rivals like GM posting +17% Q1 growth amid pre-tariff demand.
Operational Challenges
Tesla cited production losses tied to Model Y line upgrades, though recovery is reportedly underway.
The company hopes the redesigned Model Y will revive demand
Musk held a town hall urging employees to keep their shares amid the stock’s >40% decline from its December peak
Internal optimism remains pinned on future gains from autonomous driving tech
Political Fallout and Brand Erosion
Musk’s dual role as CEO and political influencer has intensified criticism:
His activism has damaged Tesla’s brand in Europe and U.S.
He was recently in Wisconsin campaigning for a Supreme Court candidate — who lost
Investors and analysts are calling for him to refocus on Tesla
“This quarter was an example of the damage Musk is causing Tesla... This is a full-blown crisis and it’s primarily self-inflicted.” – Dan Ives, Wedbush
TL;DR
Tesla’s Q1 delivery miss underscores growing brand, operational, and competitive pressures — compounded by Elon Musk’s divisive political activism. With sales falling short across the U.S., Europe, and China, and rivals like BYD pulling ahead, Tesla faces a self-inflicted identity crisis just as it prepares for the next leg of its EV and autonomy journey.
McLaren to Merge with EV Start-up Forseven Backed by NIO in Radical Makeover
Key Developments
British supercar maker McLaren will merge with UK EV start-up Forseven, in a major restructuring under new owner CYVN Holdings. The Abu Dhabi investment group, which also backs Chinese EV maker NIO, completed its acquisition of McLaren Automotive and took a minority stake in McLaren’s F1 team.
The merger aims to expand McLaren’s lineup beyond supercars, potentially adding an SUV
Forseven hopes to launch its own luxury EV by decade’s end, leveraging McLaren’s brand
The new group will be led by Nick Collins, formerly of Jaguar Land Rover
Financial and Strategic Drivers
McLaren has been loss-making for five years and sought a partner to fund new model development. Talks with CYVN began a year ago.
CYVN plans long-term strategic investment beyond just launching an SUV
McLaren could tap into NIO’s EV tech via the Forseven connection, though CEO Leiters has been cautious on full electrification of supercars
The group will maintain UK production for its sports cars, while future manufacturing locations remain undisclosed
Market Context
McLaren’s move comes as Trump’s 25% car tariffs raise costs for foreign-made vehicles entering the U.S., McLaren’s biggest market. Other luxury brands like Ferrari and Lamborghini have boosted growth via SUVs — a space McLaren has historically avoided.
The merger allows for more flexibility in adapting to EV trends and market pressures
McLaren will aim to “extend its line-up without diluting the brand,” aligning with luxury-sector shifts
TL;DR
McLaren will merge with British EV start-up Forseven, backed by CYVN and NIO, in a strategic overhaul aimed at expanding its model range, strengthening its EV capabilities, and securing long-term growth. The move positions McLaren to join the electric SUV race while cautiously navigating the transition from petrol and hybrid supercars.
Aston Martin Raises £125mn to Offset Trump’s Tariff Blow
Key Developments
Key measures include:
• A £52.5mn share issue to chair Lawrence Stroll’s consortium, boosting its stake from 28% to 33%
• A planned sale of the company’s ~5% stake in the Aston Martin Racing F1 team at a premium to its £74mn book value
• Proceeds aimed at shoring up finances as the company navigates exposure to the US market, which accounts for 30% of annual sales
Financial and Strategic Response
CEO Adrian Hallmark reaffirmed Aston Martin’s 2025 profitability target, saying the group will counteract tariff pressure through:
• Price increases on new vehicles
• Higher-margin bespoke/customization offerings
• Ongoing internal cost-cutting
Despite these actions, volume growth expectations were revised down from “mid-single digit” to “modest growth.”
Market Reaction
The market welcomed the funding move, sending shares up 13% on Monday. This rebound comes after a 43% drop since February, when the company reported a £100mn operating loss. The projected £30mn tariff hit roughly equals Aston Martin’s anticipated EBIT for 2025, highlighting the scale of the threat.
Strategic Context
The financing strategy demonstrates Aston Martin’s shift toward long-term stabilization under Stroll, Geely, and Saudi Arabia’s PIF. The F1 divestment also capitalizes on soaring valuations in the motorsport world—AMR GP may now be worth £1.5bn, up from £1bn when Arctos Partners invested last year.
While the funding is partially driven by the tariff shock, Stroll emphasized his ongoing commitment to the brand and called the timing of the announcement a coincidence.
TL;DR
Facing a £30mn tariff hit from Trump’s 25% US auto levies, Aston Martin is raising £125mn via a share sale and a divestment of its F1 stake. With price hikes, customization margins, and cost cuts, the company still expects to reach profitability in 2025—but its volume outlook has dimmed.
Comments
Chris H
What a week
FB
So far local eu news and expressions of local eu leaders seems to point to a stance on USA that does not favor the latter.
![Giantess, feet and Growth [18+] from patreon](https://fapscommunity.com/kistorage/106445.jpg)
