HYDRA 1.1B PRO and HYDRA 1.1C PRO

whoosh

I've been running 1.1C on a 5950x/MSI X-570 mobo. I completed the diagnostics and began running XMRig. My system appeared stable for a few hours then I had an APIC ID:14 error (unstable frequency). I went ahead and reduced Core#8 by 10 in CO Table #2 and I also increased CCD#2 by 10 in SSE CO Offset for MT per the log recommendations. Restarted the system, ran fine for a few hours, suddenly it failed again with APIC ID:14 error. I haven't adjusted my AVX1 values yet since they are all zeroes. Any suggestions about what to try next ?

Alexander Wünsche

Going for option 1, of course. There's no need for overriding the BEST CORES! You got less than 2 hours to release ;)

1

1

Mumpitz23

1

elpuertorro

1

1

1

1

Tom Parkinson

Option 1 would be preferable for me.

Prefer option 1

newlibrarian

Option 1, I need stable version.

Option 1 i would say. Currently i experience freezes when it tries to boost higher. Also i got better single core results with 1.1.9 bios, but better multicore results with hydra. I hope it makes sense to you, because i couldnt understand why this happens.

Jeliel

Got unstable system since Hydra too. :( Better a more stable version instead of a full featured one.

Option 1

Option 1

Doug Wilkinson

option 1. and great work my dude.

I agree with option 1

Hi! Option 1 sound a better option, and great job 👏

option 1 in my opinion

Option 1 sounds good

Thank you for all the work on that - I would prefer option 2

JohnTheFarmer

Option 1

I think Option 2, for me. But it is the Workload how decides and it is the Number of tweaks. Good Job Yuri

Option 1

Option 1

Joni Ollanketo

Option #1

Option #1

Agreed, I spent about a month getting my system stable wih Hydra trying different CO values and base frequency. CTR 2.1 RC5 I was using before was absolutely stable for me.

Option 2, I think.

1. I'm still on CTR 2.1 RC6 as all the newer versions were unstable for me. Please work on stability instead of the new features. Make it rock solid so that one can install it and forget about it.

i think if other things is ready, only Overriding best cores not work, so we can wait that problem solved but test another fixes.

Ricky Campbell

Option 1

SubiXT

Option 1sound good but as stated above a 3rd option might be better. a better version is better than an interim. i rather wait

Option 1 looks better. But may I suggest 3th option? Just wait end of the month to get better version without wasting time for interim measures.

I'd prefer option 1 as well.

Option 1 sounds like the best way to move forward.

Option 1

Option 1

i think my choice is number 1. i can wait when problem is solved and get much possible stable version. :)

Beech Horn

Option 1

Vote for option 1.