FapsCommunity
CallumStephenDiggle from patreon
CallumStephenDiggle patreon

The fall of the Yarkeenian Empire.

🕑 Added 2025-04-01 20:56:07 +0000 UTC
The fall of the Yarkeenian Empire.

Comments

Random guy

Alien p*ssy? LET'S GOOO

Callum Diggle

I’m only doing one more post for this volume and that’s going to be on the Tandrax, but I can include more biology focused content in the next volume, what specifically would you like to see expanded upon?

Burger Messiah

What’s Yarkeen biology like? Or is this gonna be a post soon?

Callum Diggle

I think the problem is inherent to large-scale governance: the larger a state and the population it governs, the more intense this factor becomes. A large state necessitates a centralized government to ensure effective governance, maintain unity, and coordinate resources across vast territories. This need becomes even more pronounced on a global scale, where administrative complexity increases. As governance expands, so too does the challenge of managing diverse populations, a larger economy, and a vast yet cohesive legal system. A global government would face immense logistical challenges, from maintaining communication networks and transportation infrastructure to enforcing law and order, managing sewage systems, and more. The problem is inherent to a global system: a government that attempts to serve everyone ultimately serves no one effectively. With an electorate too broad to have every need, want, and desire met, mass governance inevitably shifts from serving the people to maintaining control over them. Large states, especially those with global ambitions, must increasingly rely on psychological nudging, manipulation, and both implicit and explicit coercive measures to ensure compliance and stability. As complexity grows, so does the necessity for centralized authority—not to improve the well-being of citizens, but to sustain the system itself and further entrench its hold on power. The larger a state becomes, the more its governance focuses on maintaining control rather than meeting individual needs, making centralization an inevitable consequence of scale. In smaller, localized systems of government, the needs, values, and concerns of individuals are not lost in bureaucratic abstraction but addressed through direct participation and mutual cooperation. Decision-making is not dictated by distant authorities with little understanding of local realities but by those who live within the community and are directly affected by its outcomes. Unlike vast, centralized systems that rely on coercion and depersonalized administration to maintain control, local governance fosters a sense of agency, shared responsibility, and human connection. Here, democracy is not reduced to a numbers game where the individual is rendered insignificant but a lived experience where every voice holds weight. The more intimate the scale of governance, the more meaningful and legitimate it becomes—rooted not in the maintenance of power but in the genuine service of human needs. For large-scale states, “bread and circuses” is a time-tested method of keeping populations passive—distracting them with cheap entertainment and material comforts while ensuring they never meaningfully challenge the system that governs them. As long as people are fed, entertained, and given the illusion of choice, real political change remains elusive. Representative democracies reinforce this illusion by offering candidates who, despite their apparent differences, have already been vetted by the permanent bureaucracy, corporate interests, and other entrenched power structures. Elections become little more than a stage play—no matter who wins, the system itself remains untouched. Even those framed as political dissidents—figures who claim to oppose the status quo—are often nothing more than controlled opposition, carefully positioned to absorb public frustration without ever posing a genuine threat to power. These figures thrive within the system, gaining influence and credibility while ensuring that dissent remains within acceptable limits. When social unrest threatens to boil over, these so-called dissidents become especially useful as containment agents—figures who redirect public anger into safe, manageable channels. By offering superficial criticisms and controlled forms of resistance, they provide the disaffected population with a sense of catharsis—a way to vent frustration without ever stepping outside the system’s boundaries. This is the essence of political containment: not the outright suppression of opposition, but its careful management. The goal is to prevent disorder while getting people to buy back into the system they had begun to question. Whether through co-opting protest movements, enacting hollow reforms, or elevating “outsider” politicians who are anything but, the system ensures that discontent never turns into revolution. Instead, the cycle repeats—crisis, containment, pacification—while the structures of power remain firmly in place. Sorry, I went on a bit of a rant there, but I wanted to make clear the issue with “citizens having more control over government” when we’re talking about a system of this magnitude. The individual, even entire communities of individuals get lost in the noise and if their voice is a threat to the interests of power, those in power find ways to silence them. I also tried to highlight some of the ways in which I think a system like this would operate and the methods it would use to maintain a system of control. I agree with your statement that nations can change, but the UE isn’t a nation, it’s a global state. I personally do not think the UE can change because I believe the issue to be intrinsic to the nature of both power and scale. Oh undoubtedly, I’m sure some modifications could be made to be heritable also. That’s an interesting idea and it’s certainly possible that there is a philosophical world view driving the mod movement, or multiple for that matter. Oof it’s impossible to say, the possibilities a quite literally endless when you start pulling at that thread, you’re getting into some serious All Tomorrows territory there haha actually, that’s my answer, All Tomorrows!

Erika Spooner

Amazing work! I wonder what things would have been like if the U.E. had changed for the better, allowing their citizens more freedom and control over their government. I think it is possible for nations to change for the better, even those that previously engaged in atrocities. Do you think the U.E. could ever change to be better? If people had genetic engineering technology and the mod community regularly used it, did some mods try to genetically engineer their offspring when they were embyros? Did some mods try to use this to build a new version of humanity that they thought wouldn't make the mistakes of the previous one? I imagine in some alternate timeline humanity becomes a new power in the Orion-Cygnus spur which has become obsessed with engineering generation after generation to be better than the last. If that could happen, what do you think it would look like?


More Creators